Interview, a battle of wits and courage
Interview, a battle of wits and courage
Thinking about the interview process, sometimes it really seems like a war of wits and courage, we are trembling, walking on thin ice, frightened, insisting on ourselves, turning the tide, frustrating the others, and finally willow bank flowers, thinking about it is also quite fulfilling. It is not to learn "deception", but to learn to be "smart" and learn to skillfully reverse the situation in the midst of disadvantages. Interview, a battle of wits and courage Scene 1: The interviewer was disappointed in meDuring the interview, the interviewer frowned or shook his head lightly at me from time to time, and seemed to be very dissatisfied with my performance. Tips: Don't be influenced by othersGenerally speaking, interviewers have considerable work experience, and they know better that as a representative of the company, they should be friendly to maintain the company's image. One possibility is that the interviewer pretends to be dissatisfied with the candidate's performance and observes how the candidate reacts. In this case, candidates should try to answer the interviewer's questions as much as possible, as we cannot control the reactions of others, as long as we keep ourselves doing well. Whether you think the other party is friendly or satisfied is only a subjective feeling, and people are easy to selectively receive negative information when they are nervous, and they will unconsciously amplify a small action of the other party, thinking that it is not good for them. In this case, it is more important to relax yourself, not be swayed by the emotions of the interviewer, regain your confidence, and only focus on expressing yourself and not be influenced by others. Scenario 2: Why are you lying? When I applied for a consulting position, the interviewer asked me a question: Q: Have you done any analysis reports? A: How many times have you asked: How long does it take for you to make an analysis report? A: Maybe about 2 weeks Q: Now I ask you to make an analysis report in 1 day, do you think it's okay? Answer:...... Well......, I think so. Q: You usually take 2 weeks to make an analysis report, but now it takes 1 day to do it, don't you think what you said is very fake? Why are you lying? Answer:...... I...... (The face began to fever, and the palms of the hands began to sweat) Tips: Quickly justify yourself For a normal person, some people say that you "say something very fake" and "why do you lie"? In this society that emphasizes integrity, my performance has been questioned by others, "yes, why should I lie"? But there's a premise error here, it's not about why you're lying, it's actually the interviewer testing the candidate's reaction, and if you can justify yourself, you can even turn defeat into victory. For example, the following answer: "I don't think it's false at all, and I'm not lying, because I do things for the purpose of completing tasks and achieving results, if I have to complete it within 1 day, I can organize a group to complete it together, or seek other help to achieve the goal". It's very clever to deal with similar situations in different professions. Scene 3: Group discussion meets "wicked people" In the group discussion, some people are good at debating, and they will talk endlessly as soon as they start talking, maybe nonsense, Rory is verbose, and does not get to the point at all, but they are coaxing, have a tough attitude, and do not give others a chance to speak. This kind of "undershooting" person robbed others many times, and I was refuted many times but couldn't deal with it, I only felt stuffy in my chest, and I couldn't get out of my breath, and my heart was naturally not a taste. Tips: Take the initiative to ease the atmosphere But a simple truth is that the white grabber does not mean that the white player is not the same as a good performance, and the refuted person is not necessarily at a disadvantage, the person who talks the most in the group discussion may not get the highest score, and the person who challenges other people's arguments in person will even give a negative image, so don't insist that the candidate who often grabs your white is in the upper hand, he may be at a disadvantage, and you can definitely take advantage of the situation to highlight yourself